Wootten's Appeal

86 A. 877, 239 Pa. 385, 1913 Pa. LEXIS 575
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedFebruary 24, 1913
DocketAppeal, No. 28
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 86 A. 877 (Wootten's Appeal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wootten's Appeal, 86 A. 877, 239 Pa. 385, 1913 Pa. LEXIS 575 (Pa. 1913).

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The bequest of the testatrix to Lucy O. Jewett was not to her as a member of a class — children of Mrs. Lucy A. Jewett. It was to her by name, to pass to her if she survived the testatrix, and to lapse if she did not. The learned court below, in construing the will of the testatrix, held that, if she had survived, she would have taken one-fourth of the residuary estate. This is not questioned by counsel for appellant or appellee, but, as she died in the lifetime of the testatrix, the latter’s provision for her lapsed and escheated to the Commonwealth, for there were no known heirs or next of kin of Anna Sophia Eells to take it.

Decree affirmed at appellant’s costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cryder v. Garrison
128 A.2d 761 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1957)
Callery's Estate
3 A.2d 407 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1938)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
86 A. 877, 239 Pa. 385, 1913 Pa. LEXIS 575, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/woottens-appeal-pa-1913.