Wooten v. Wooten

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Wooten v. Wooten

407 So. 2d 980, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 21922

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 14, 1981

DocketNo. 80-1988

StatusPublished

This text of 407 So. 2d 980 (Wooten v. Wooten) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wooten v. Wooten, 407 So. 2d 980, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 21922 (Fla. Ct. App. 1981).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a final judgment which enforced a property settlement agreement previously entered into by the parties and incorporated into their final judgment of dissolution of marriage. Under the terms of the agreement, title to the marital home was conveyed to the wife and the husband was to make the mortgage payments thereon. The issue presented is whether, under the terms of the agreement, the husband must continue to pay an amount equal to the regular mortgage payments on the marital home after it was sold by the wife. Under the circumstances of this case and the agreement in question, we believe the trial court properly found that the husband was so obligated, and we therefore affirm. See Salsman v. Salsman, 360 So.2d 54 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978); Horton v. Horton, 330 So.2d 69 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976).

AFFIRMED.

LETTS, C. J., and MOORE and BERA-NEK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a final judgment which enforced a property settlement agreement previously entered into by the parties and incorporated into their final judgment of dissolution of marriage. Under the terms of the agreement, title to the marital home was conveyed to the wife and the husband was to make the mortgage payments thereon. The issue presented is whether, under the terms of the agreement, the husband must continue to pay an amount equal to the regular mortgage payments on the marital home after it was sold by the wife. Under the circumstances of this case and the agreement in question, we believe the trial court properly found that the husband was so obligated, and we therefore affirm. See Salsman v. Salsman, 360 So.2d 54 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978); Horton v. Horton, 330 So.2d 69 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976).

AFFIRMED.

LETTS, C. J., and MOORE and BERA-NEK, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

407 So. 2d 980, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 21922, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wooten-v-wooten-fladistctapp-1981.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack