Wooten v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Wooten v. State

557 S.W.3d 521

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedSeptember 11, 2018

DocketED 105915

StatusPublished

This text of 557 S.W.3d 521 (Wooten v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wooten v. State, 557 S.W.3d 521 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

*522Casitdel Wooten appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his motion for post-conviction relief under Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 29.15 (2015) after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. The motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed. Mo. R. Civ. P. 84.16(b) (2018).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

*522Casitdel Wooten appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his motion for post-conviction relief under Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 29.15 (2015) after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. The motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed. Mo. R. Civ. P. 84.16(b) (2018).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

557 S.W.3d 521, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wooten-v-state-moctapp-2018.