Wooten v. State
This text of 264 S.E.2d 250 (Wooten v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The appellant was convicted of "enticing a child for indecent purposes” and was sentenced to three years’ imprisonment. Although he enumerates six alleged errors on appeal, the only legally cognizable issue raised in five of these is the sufficiency of the evidence. Held:
1. We find the evidence sufficient to convince a rational trier of fact of the appellant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. See Jackson v. Virginia, — U. S. — (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560) (1979).
2. The trial court’s refusal to direct a verdict of acquittal at the close of the state’s case does not require reversal, despite the state’s failure as of that time to introduce evidence showing the child’s age, since the state did ultimately introduce such evidence. See Bethay v. State, 235 Ga. 371 (1) (219 SE2d 743) (1975).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
264 S.E.2d 250, 152 Ga. App. 791, 1979 Ga. App. LEXIS 3085, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wooten-v-state-gactapp-1979.