Wooten v. State

149 S.E. 299, 40 Ga. App. 271, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 125
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedAugust 23, 1929
Docket19848
StatusPublished

This text of 149 S.E. 299 (Wooten v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wooten v. State, 149 S.E. 299, 40 Ga. App. 271, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 125 (Ga. Ct. App. 1929).

Opinions

Per Curiam.

1. The grounds of the motion for a new trial complaining of. the admission of evidence fail to show what objection was made to the evidence at the time it was offered, and, therefore, under repeated rulings of the Supreme Court and of this court, are not in proper form to be considered.

2. The remaining grounds show no harmful error.

3. The evidence connecting the accused with the offense charged was meager and not altogether satisfactory to this court, but it can not be held that the verdict was unauthorized by any evidence, and, the finding of the jury having been approved by the trial judge, this court is without authority to interfere.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and Bloodivorth, J., concur. Luke, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
149 S.E. 299, 40 Ga. App. 271, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 125, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wooten-v-state-gactapp-1929.