Wooten v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Wooten v. State

36 So. 3d 187, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 8242, 2010 WL 2330414

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 11, 2010

Docket2D09-3231

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 36 So. 3d 187 (Wooten v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wooten v. State, 36 So. 3d 187, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 8242, 2010 WL 2330414 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

ALTENBERND, Judge.

James E. Wooten appeals from the dismissal without prejudice of his motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. The circuit court judge found that all of his claims related to the entry of a plea were facially insufficient because Mr. Wooten did not specifically explain how he was prejudiced by his counsel’s deficient performance. The court appropriately dismissed the motion and permitted Mr. Wooten to refile an amended version within sixty days of the date of its order. Unfortunately, however, the court also advised Mr. Wooten that he had only thirty days to appeal the order. “That advice was legally incorrect.” See Callaghan v. State, 32 So.3d 72, 73 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009) (citing Lawrence v. State, 987 So.2d 157 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008)).

A dismissal of a postconviction motion without prejudice, which contemplates further amendment or refiling before it can be considered on its merits, is a nonfinal, *188 nonappealable order. See Havens v. State, 27 So.3d 803, 804 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010); Christner v. State, 984 So.2d 561, 563 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008). It appears that Mr. Wooten has until sometime in November 2010 before his time to file motions under rule 3.850 will have expired. However, the circuit court’s admonition to refile the motion within a specific time has been approved by this court as a way to insure that rule 3.850 motions raising one or more claims are ripened and ready for disposition on the merits — and further appellate review if denied — in a timely and efficient manner. See Havens, 27 So.3d at 804; Christner, 984 So.2d at 563. Therefore, this court’s dismissal is without prejudice for Mr. Wooten to refile his amended motion in the circuit court within sixty days of the date on which this opinion becomes final.

YILLANTI and LaROSE, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

ALTENBERND, Judge.

James E. Wooten appeals from the dismissal without prejudice of his motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. The circuit court judge found that all of his claims related to the entry of a plea were facially insufficient because Mr. Wooten did not specifically explain how he was prejudiced by his counsel’s deficient performance. The court appropriately dismissed the motion and permitted Mr. Wooten to refile an amended version within sixty days of the date of its order. Unfortunately, however, the court also advised Mr. Wooten that he had only thirty days to appeal the order. “That advice was legally incorrect.” See Callaghan v. State, 32 So.3d 72, 73 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009) (citing Lawrence v. State, 987 So.2d 157 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008)).

A dismissal of a postconviction motion without prejudice, which contemplates further amendment or refiling before it can be considered on its merits, is a nonfinal, *188 nonappealable order. See Havens v. State, 27 So.3d 803, 804 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010); Christner v. State, 984 So.2d 561, 563 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008). It appears that Mr. Wooten has until sometime in November 2010 before his time to file motions under rule 3.850 will have expired. However, the circuit court’s admonition to refile the motion within a specific time has been approved by this court as a way to insure that rule 3.850 motions raising one or more claims are ripened and ready for disposition on the merits — and further appellate review if denied — in a timely and efficient manner. See Havens, 27 So.3d at 804; Christner, 984 So.2d at 563. Therefore, this court’s dismissal is without prejudice for Mr. Wooten to refile his amended motion in the circuit court within sixty days of the date on which this opinion becomes final.

YILLANTI and LaROSE, JJ., Concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

36 So. 3d 187, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 8242, 2010 WL 2330414, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wooten-v-state-fladistctapp-2010.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack