Wooten v. Lightburn

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: November 12, 2009
• Docket: 08-2279
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-2279

OLIN WOOTEN,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

ROBERT C. LIGHTBURN,

Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Abingdon. Glen M. Williams, Senior District Judge. (1:07-cv-00052-gmw-pms)

Submitted: October 28, 2009 Decided: November 12, 2009

Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

C. Connor Crook, BOYLE, BAIN, REBACK & SLAYTON, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellant. Daniel R. Bieger, COPELAND & BIEGER, P.C., Abingdon, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Robert C. Lightburn appeals the district court’s order

entering judgment in Olin Wooten’s favor on Wooten’s specific

performance and unjust enrichment claims against Lightburn. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. See

Wooten v. Lightburn, No. 1:07-cv-00052-gmw-pms (W.D. Va.

Sept. 30, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED