Home/Court of Appeals of Arkansas/Wooten v. Daniels

Wooten v. Daniels

607 S.W.2d 96, 271 Ark. 131, 1980 Ark. App. LEXIS 1428
Court of Appeals of Arkansas·Decided November 12, 1980·No. E 80-118·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam

This case was erroneously placed on our docket as an appeal. The only document filed with this court is a letter from the father of the claimant Mark Wooten requesting an extension of the deadline for filing a petition for review with this court. Thus, there has been no appeal in this case.

We deny the request for extension for two reasons. First, we have no authority to extend the 15-day deadline for filing petition for review as prescribed in Ark. Stat. Ann., § 81-1107(d)(7)""(Supp. 1979)- Secondly, the o'nly evidence presented by claimant’s father with respect to his authority to act for the claimant was a power of attorney giving him authority to purchase and sell personal property on behalf of the claimant. It did not authorize him to represent the claimant in the manner purported in the letter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wooten v. Daniels, 607 S.W.2d 96, 271 Ark. 131, 1980 Ark. App. LEXIS 1428 (Ark. Ct. App. 1980).

607 S.W.2d 96 (Wooten v. Daniels) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Branson v. Director, Arkansas Employment Security Department
73 S.W.3d 616 (Court of Appeals of Arkansas, 2002)
Cockrell v. Director, Arkansas Employment Security Department
992 S.W.2d 181 (Court of Appeals of Arkansas, 1999)
Green v. Director, Employment Security Division
901 S.W.2d 860 (Court of Appeals of Arkansas, 1995)
Woodus v. Director of Labor
648 S.W.2d 528 (Court of Appeals of Arkansas, 1983)