Wooten v. Brevard County

Supreme Court

Wooten v. Brevard County

278 U.S. 581, 49 S. Ct. 184

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided January 14, 1929·No. No. 109·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The appeal is dismissed (1) for want of a substantial federal question on.the authority of Shul[582] this v. McDougal, 225 U. S. 561, 569; Hebert v. Louisiana, 272 U. S. 312, 316-317; (2) because the affirmance below was based on a nonfederal ground adequate to support it. Bilby v. Stewart, 246 U. S. 255, 257.

Mr. L. C. Crofton for appellee in support of the'motion; Messrs. W. E. Kay, Thomas B. Adams, and Henry C. Clark for appellant in opposition thereto.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

The appeal is dismissed (1) for want of a substantial federal question on.the authority of Shul[582] this v. McDougal, 225 U. S. 561, 569; Hebert v. Louisiana, 272 U. S. 312, 316-317; (2) because the affirmance below was based on a nonfederal ground adequate to support it. Bilby v. Stewart, 246 U. S. 255, 257.

Mr. L. C. Crofton for appellee in support of the'motion; Messrs. W. E. Kay, Thomas B. Adams, and Henry C. Clark for appellant in opposition thereto.

Wooten v. Brevard County, 278 U.S. 581, 49 S. Ct. 184 (1929).

Pincite

278 U.S. 581 (Wooten v. Brevard County) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related