Wooten v. Brevard County

Supreme Court

Wooten v. Brevard County

278 U.S. 581, 49 S. Ct. 184

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedJanuary 14, 1929

DocketNo. 109

StatusPublished

This text of 278 U.S. 581 (Wooten v. Brevard County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wooten v. Brevard County, 278 U.S. 581, 49 S. Ct. 184 (1929).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The appeal is dismissed (1) for want of a substantial federal question on.the authority of Shul[582]*582this v. McDougal, 225 U. S. 561, 569; Hebert v. Louisiana, 272 U. S. 312, 316-317; (2) because the affirmance below was based on a nonfederal ground adequate to support it. Bilby v. Stewart, 246 U. S. 255, 257.

Mr. L. C. Crofton for appellee in support of the'motion; Messrs. W. E. Kay, Thomas B. Adams, and Henry C. Clark for appellant in opposition thereto.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

The appeal is dismissed (1) for want of a substantial federal question on.the authority of Shul[582]*582this v. McDougal, 225 U. S. 561, 569; Hebert v. Louisiana, 272 U. S. 312, 316-317; (2) because the affirmance below was based on a nonfederal ground adequate to support it. Bilby v. Stewart, 246 U. S. 255, 257.

Mr. L. C. Crofton for appellee in support of the'motion; Messrs. W. E. Kay, Thomas B. Adams, and Henry C. Clark for appellant in opposition thereto.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

278 U.S. 581, 49 S. Ct. 184, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wooten-v-brevard-county-scotus-1929.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack