Wooten v. Brevard County

115 So. 825, 95 Fla. 344
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided February 22, 1928·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Whitfield and Mr. Justice Terrell, are of opinion that the decree should be reversed. Mr. Justice Strum, Mr. Justice Brown and Mr. Justice Buford are of the opinion that the decree should be affirmed. When the members of the Supreme Court sitting sis members in a body and after full consultation it appears that the members of the Court are permanently and equally divided in opinion as to whether the judgment should' be affirmed or reversed, and there is no prospect of an immediate change in the personnel of the Court, the judgment should be affirmed; therefore it is considered, ordered and decreed under the authority of State ex rel. Hampton v. McClung, 47 Fla. 224, 37 South. Rep. 51, that the decree of the Circuit Court in this cause be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Ellis, C. J., and Whitfield, Terrell, Strum, Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wooten v. Brevard County, 115 So. 825, 95 Fla. 344 (Fla. 1928).

115 So. 825 (Wooten v. Brevard County) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State ex rel. Hampton v. McClung
47 Fla. 224 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1904)
Griffith v. Alcocke
37 So. 47 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1904)