Wooten, Christopher Bennett

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedApril 10, 2019
DocketWR-64,526-10
StatusPublished

This text of Wooten, Christopher Bennett (Wooten, Christopher Bennett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wooten, Christopher Bennett, (Tex. 2019).

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-64,526-10

EX PARTE CHRISTOPHER BENNETT WOOTEN, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 31429 IN THE COUNTY COURT FROM HOWARD COUNTY

Per curiam.

OPINION

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of misdemeanor

driving while intoxicated and received deferred adjudication community supervision.

On May 15, 2018, Applicant filed a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to Article 11.072 of the

Texas Code of Criminal Procedure in the trial court, challenging this conviction. The trial court

denied relief on August 27, 2018. Apparently, Applicant did not receive notice of the trial court’s

decision until October 25,2018, after the deadline for filing notice of appeal had passed. Applicant

filed an untimely notice of appeal on November 7, 2018. The Eleventh Court of Appeals dismissed 2

the appeal for want of jurisdiction because notice of appeal was untimely. Ex parte Wooten, No. 11-

18-00307-CR (Tex. App. — Eastland, Dec. 13, 2018) (not designated for publication).

Applicant sought further relief by way of a petition for discretionary review in this Court.

This Court denied Applicant’s petition for discretionary review, but advised him to seek relief by

way of original habeas in this Court.

Applicant subsequently filed this application, which we construe as an original habeas

application, seeking an out-of-time appeal from the trial court’s denial of relief in his Article 11.072

habeas application.

We find that Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of-time appeal from the

Order Of Summary Denial Of Application For Writ of Habeas Corpus in Cause No. 31429 from the

County Court of Howard County. Applicant is ordered returned to that time at which he may give

a written notice of appeal so that he may then obtain a meaningful appeal. All time limits shall be

calculated as if the trial court’s order denying habeas relief was entered on the date on which the

mandate of this Court issues. We hold that, should Applicant desire to prosecute an appeal, he must

take affirmative steps to file a written notice of appeal in the trial court within 30 days after the

mandate of this Court issues.

Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice-Correctional

Institutions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.

Delivered: April 10, 2019 Do not publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Young
418 S.W.2d 824 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Wooten, Christopher Bennett, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wooten-christopher-bennett-texcrimapp-2019.