Wootan v. State
This text of 257 S.W. 265 (Wootan v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— The The unlawful sale of intoxicating liquor is the offense; punishment fixed at confinement in the penitentiary for a period of one year.
Ray Buie was named as the purchaser. But one witness was called. According to his evidence, he and Ray Buie went to the home of the appellant and entered his house together. Buie stated that he wanted a bottle of whisky and the appellant said, “all right.” He got a pint of whisky and received two dollars therefor. There was no cross-examination of the witness and no testimony for the appellant.
There are'no bills of exceptions.
The evidence is deemed sufficient to support the conviction.
The judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
257 S.W. 265, 96 Tex. Crim. 238, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wootan-v-state-texcrimapp-1924.