Wooster v. State

94 S.E. 279, 21 Ga. App. 287, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 561
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided November 14, 1917·No. 8955·Published

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

1. The record in this ease shows that the defendant, who^was charged with adultery and fornication, he being unmarried and the woman married, confessed his guilt. Under the rulings in Burger v. State, 81 Ga. 196 (6 S. E. 282), and Cook v. State, 11 Ga. 53 (6), 54 (56 Am. D. 410), the confession was sufficiently corroborated by proof that the defendant and the woman lived together as man and wife, and for several months slept in a room with one'bed. See also McArthur v. State, 19 Ga. App. 747 (92 S. E. 234).

2. The grounds of the amended motion for new trial are without merit, and the judge did not err in refusing a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, P. J., and Harwell, J., eoneur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wooster v. State, 94 S.E. 279, 21 Ga. App. 287, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 561 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917).

94 S.E. 279 (Wooster v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cook v. State
11 Ga. 53 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1852)
Burger v. State
6 S.E. 282 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1888)
McArthur v. State
92 S.E. 234 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)