Wooster v. Clark

9 F. 854, 1881 U.S. App. LEXIS 2558
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York·Decided August 29, 1881·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Blatchford, C. J.

The motion to strike out the testimony taken on the part of the defendants must be granted. Rule 69 is imperative, that no testimony taken after time shall be allowed to be read at the hearing. The plaintiff duly objected on the record to the taking of what was taken, on the ground that it was taken after time, and such objection has never been waived. Moreover, the defendants, after that, specially moved for time to take proofs, and the motion was denied.

The proof of the sale of a binder is sufficient. It is plain that it infringes claims 2, 4, and 5. The granting of the reissue to the plaintiff is sufficient proof of his title to sue.

There must be a decree for the plaintiff.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wooster v. Clark, 9 F. 854, 1881 U.S. App. LEXIS 2558 (circtsdny 1881).

9 F. 854 (Wooster v. Clark) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

E. M. Biggs Tie & Store Co. v. Arlington Land Co.
186 P. 449 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1919)
Jackson v. Wolverine Copper Mining Co.
186 F. 643 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York, 1911)
Western Electric Co. v. Capital Telephone & Telegraph Co.
86 F. 769 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California, 1898)
Coosaw Min. Co. v. Farmers' Min. Co.
67 F. 31 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of South Carolina, 1895)