Wooster Associates v. Lates, No. 099552 (Jan. 7, 1991)

1991 Conn. Super. Ct. 52
Connecticut Superior Court·Decided January 7, 1991·No. No. 099552·Unpublished

Opinion

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] ORDER The respondent has failed to establish probable cause to support a finding that the construction services he provided were provided "by virtue of an agreement with or the consent of the [applicant] or by the consent of some person having authority from or rightfully acting for [the applicant]. . ." Newtown Associates v. Northeast Structures, Inc., 15 Conn. App. 633, 637 (1988). More specifically, there is no evidence of an agreement or of the kind of consent required by law. Avery v. Smith, 96 Conn. 223,228 (1921); Newtown Associates v. Northeast Structures, Inc., supra 640.

The application is granted and the lien therein described is discharged.

So ordered.

GAFFNEY, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wooster Associates v. Lates, No. 099552 (Jan. 7, 1991), 1991 Conn. Super. Ct. 52 (Colo. Ct. App. 1991).

1991 Conn. Super. Ct. 52 (Wooster Associates v. Lates, No. 099552 (Jan. 7, 1991)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Avery v. Smith
113 A. 313 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1921)
Newtown Associates v. Northeast Structures, Inc.
546 A.2d 310 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1988)