Woolum v. State

114 N.E.2d 561, 232 Ind. 703, 1953 Ind. LEXIS 272
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 2, 1953
DocketNo. 0-342
StatusPublished

This text of 114 N.E.2d 561 (Woolum v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Woolum v. State, 114 N.E.2d 561, 232 Ind. 703, 1953 Ind. LEXIS 272 (Ind. 1953).

Opinion

Flanagan, J.

This is a petition for a writ of mandamus. It is not prosecuted in the name of the State of Indiana on the relation of the interested party, and therefore must be, and is, denied. Section 3-2201, Burns’ 1946 Replacement; State ex rel. Ketchum v. Marshall, Judge (1952), 231 Ind. 70, 106 N. E. 2d 796.

Gilkison, J., not participating.

Note. — Reported in 114 N. E. 2d 561.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State Ex Rel. Ketchum v. Marshall
106 N.E.2d 796 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1952)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
114 N.E.2d 561, 232 Ind. 703, 1953 Ind. LEXIS 272, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/woolum-v-state-ind-1953.