Woolum v. State

114 N.E.2d 561, 232 Ind. 703, 1953 Ind. LEXIS 272
Indiana Supreme Court·Decided October 2, 1953·No. No. 0-342·Published

Opinion

Flanagan, J.

This is a petition for a writ of mandamus. It is not prosecuted in the name of the State of Indiana on the relation of the interested party, and therefore must be, and is, denied. Section 3-2201, Burns’ 1946 Replacement; State ex rel. Ketchum v. Marshall, Judge (1952), 231 Ind. 70, 106 N. E. 2d 796.

Gilkison, J., not participating.

Note. — Reported in 114 N. E. 2d 561.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Woolum v. State, 114 N.E.2d 561, 232 Ind. 703, 1953 Ind. LEXIS 272 (Ind. 1953).

114 N.E.2d 561 (Woolum v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State Ex Rel. Ketchum v. Marshall
106 N.E.2d 796 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1952)