Woolston's Appeal

51 Pa. 452, 1866 Pa. LEXIS 58
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided February 8, 1866·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

The opinion was delivered

Per Curiam.

The law governing the case was accurately applied by the auditor to the facts found by him, and we could not profitably add anything to what he has so well said in his report. Nor do we think there is any good ground of complaint of the finding of the auditor, against the allegation that Plumly was on the eve of entering into a hazardous business when he made the settlement. We think the testimony furnished no other proper conclusion than was drawn from it by the auditor, and that therefore the court committed no error in confirming the report, either upon this or the other grounds complained of.

Decree affirmed at the costs of the appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Woolston's Appeal, 51 Pa. 452, 1866 Pa. LEXIS 58 (Pa. 1866).

51 Pa. 452 (Woolston's Appeal) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Meehan v. Shreveport-Eldorado Pipe Line Co.
164 A. 364 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1932)
Peoples Savings & Dime Bank & Trust Co. v. Scott
154 A. 489 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1931)
Hertzler v. Nissly
144 A. 824 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1928)