Woolsey v. Western Union Telegraph Co.

271 A.D.2d 909

This text of 271 A.D.2d 909 (Woolsey v. Western Union Telegraph Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Woolsey v. Western Union Telegraph Co., 271 A.D.2d 909 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1946).

Opinion

Appeal from judgments, Madison Trial Term, rendered upon the theory that defendant was either negligent or a trespasser. The record is not clear as to the theory upon which the jury rendered a verdict. There is scant, if any, proof of negligence and the theory of trespass was not clearly presented to the jury. Judgments reversed, on the law and facts, and a new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide the event. All concur. [See post, p. 1040.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
271 A.D.2d 909, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/woolsey-v-western-union-telegraph-co-nyappdiv-1946.