Woolsey v. Dickey
This text of 9 Ky. Op. 334 (Woolsey v. Dickey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
This court has never held that a commissioner’s sale would not be set aside when the price bid was so grossly inadequate as to imply bad faith, or to indicate plain and palpable oppression.
We have here property which, less than three years ago, sold for three thousand dollars, now claimed under a bid of one hundred dollars. Such a claim is clearly unconscientious on its face, and it cannot be upheld without the most outrageous oppression. Besides, [335]*335such a sacrifice of property of itself implies fraud, and for that reason the sale may be set aside. Stump v. Martin, 9 Bush 285.
Judgment reversed and the cause remanded with instructions to set aside the sale, at the costs of the appellants.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
9 Ky. Op. 334, 1877 Ky. LEXIS 194, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/woolsey-v-dickey-kyctapp-1877.