Woolley v. Welch

CourtDistrict Court, D. Nevada
DecidedAugust 19, 2025
Docket3:25-cv-00191
StatusUnknown

This text of Woolley v. Welch (Woolley v. Welch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Nevada primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Woolley v. Welch, (D. Nev. 2025).

Opinion

KNeEvNadNaE BTaHr N Eo. .L 7Y07O1N , III KNeAvTadHaE BRaIrN NEo .F 6.2 P2A7 RKS 2 LAW OFFICES OF KENNETH E. LYON, III THORNDAL ARMSTRONG, PC 333 Flint Street 6590 S. McCarran Blvd., Ste B 3 Reno, Nevada 89501 Reno, Nevada 89501 4 Telephone: 775.786.4188 Telephone: 775.786.2882 Email: ken@lyonlaw.net Email: kfp@thorndal.com 5 Attorney for Plaintiff Attorney for Storey Defendants 6 7 JOHN ROUTSIS KARL S. HALL Nevada Bar No. 3197 Reno City Attorney 8 ROUTSIS HARDY-COOPER & PULVER HOLLY S. PARKER 505 Ridge Street Deputy City Attorney 9 Reno, Nevada 89501 Nevada Bar No. 10181 10 Telephone: 775.785.9166 Email: parkerh@reno.gov Email: john@rhcplaw.com PETER K. KEEGAN 11 Deputy City Attorney Attorney for Plaintiff Nevada Bar No. 12237 12 Email: keeganp@reno.gov Post Office Box 1900 13 Reno, Nevada 89505 14 Telephone: 775.334.2050 15 Attorneys for Reno Defendants 16 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 18 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 19 20 TYLER WOOLLEY, 21 22 Plaintiff, vs. Case No. 3:25-cv-00191-MMD-CSD 23 JOSEPH WELCH, JACOB SMILEY, ERIC 24 KERN, TERRY WEST, STOREY STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State 25 of Nevada, THE CITY OF RENO, a political 26 subdivision of the State of Nevada. 27 Defendants. 28 Plaintiff Tyler Woolley, by and through his counsel, Kenneth E. Lyon, III, and John 2 Routsis; Defendants Joseph Welch, Jacob Smiley, Eric Kern, and Storey County, by and through 3 their counsel, Katherine F. Parks; and Defendants Terry West and the City of Reno, by and 4 through their counsel, Holly S. Parker and Peter K. Keegan (collectively “the Parties”), hereby 5 agree and stipulate to the entry of a Protective Order as follows: 6 7 1. Reason for the Order: The Parties have requested or may request production of 8 documentation that the Parties contend includes confidential information or highly 9 personal private information, including but not limited to Internal Affairs files, 10 photographs, employment records, personnel records, medical records, and possibly other 11 documentation that the Parties would object to production of as confidential and private 12 documentation, or for which they may seek a protective order, if the documentation 13 14 described herein were not protected by this Stipulated Protective Order. The purpose of 15 this Stipulated Protective Order is to facilitate the Parties in the discovery process. 16 However, the mere existence of this Protective Order does not waive the Parties’ right to 17 object to production and redact certain documentation or information. If any such 18 objection is made and the Parties are unable to agree, the production or protection of the 19 documentation or information shall be submitted to the Court for review and decision 20 21 concerning production or protection. 22 2. Any Party may designate as “confidential” (by stamping the relevant page or as otherwise 23 set forth herein) any document or response to discovery which that party considers in 24 good faith to contain information involving business, financial, employment, certain 25 investigative and/or Internal Affairs information, or other confidential or protected 26 information, subject to protection under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or Nevada 27 28 law (“Confidential Information”). Where a document or response consists of more than one page, the first page and each page on which confidential information appears shall be 2 designated. 3 3. A party may designate information disclosed during a deposition or in response to written 4 discovery as “confidential” by so indicating in said response or on the record at the 5 deposition and requesting the preparation of a separate transcript of such material. 6 7 Additionally, a party may designate in writing, within twenty (20) days after receipt of 8 said responses or of the deposition transcript for which the designation is proposed, that 9 specific pages of the transcript and/or specific responses be treated as Confidential 10 Information. Any other party may object to such proposal, in writing or on record. Upon 11 such objection, the Parties shall follow the procedures described in paragraph 8 below. 12 After any designation made according to the procedure set forth in this paragraph, the 13 14 designated documents or information shall be treated according to the designation until 15 the matter is resolved according to the procedures described in paragraph 9 below, and 16 counsel for all parties shall be responsible for making all previously unmarked copies of 17 the designated material in their possession or control with the specified designation. The 18 documents subject to the claim of confidentiality shall be identified either by clearly 19 describing the document or by referring to the document by its Bates-stamp numbers, 20 21 (e.g., COR-0000). 22 4. All Confidential Information produced or exchanged in the course of this case shall be 23 used by the Parties to whom the information is produced solely for the purpose of this 24 case. 25 5. Except with the prior written consent of other parties, or upon prior order of this Court 26 obtained upon notice to opposing counsel, Confidential Information shall not be disclosed 27 28 to any person other than: a. Counsel for the respective parties to this litigation, including in-house counsel and 2 co-counsel retained for this litigation; 3 b. Employees of such counsel; 4 c. Individual defendants, any officer or employee of a Party, to the extent deemed 5 necessary by counsel for the prosecution or defense of this litigation; 6 7 d. Consultants or expert witnesses retained for the prosecution or defense of this 8 litigation, provided that each such person shall execute a copy of the Certification 9 attached to this Order as Exhibit “A” (which shall be retained by counsel to the 10 party so disclosing the Confidential Information and made available for inspection 11 by opposing counsel during the pendency of the action) before being shown or 12 given any Confidential Information. 13 14 e. Any authors or recipients of the Confidential Information; 15 f. The Court, Court personnel, and court reporters; and 16 g. Witnesses (other than persons described in paragraph 4(e)). If a witness is shown 17 Confidential Information outside of a deposition or at trial, the witness shall sign 18 the Certification attached as Exhibit “A” before being shown Confidential 19 Information. If the witness is shown Confidential Information during a deposition, 20 21 the witness is not required to sign the Certification attached as Exhibit “A”; 22 however, the attorneys for the Parties attending the deposition will inform the 23 witness that the information has been designated as confidential. Witnesses 24 shown Confidential Information shall not be allowed to retain copies. 25 h. Any mediator(s) or settlement officer(s) mutually agreed upon by the parties. 26 27 28 i. Employees of discovery or copy services, microfilming or database services, trial 2 support firms and/or translators or other litigation support vendors who are 3 engaged by the Parties during this litigation. 4 6. Any persons receiving Confidential Information shall not reveal or discuss such 5 information to or with any person who is not entitled to receive such information, except 6 7 as set forth herein. 8 7. Unless otherwise permitted by statute, rule or prior court order, papers filed with the 9 Court under seal shall be accompanied by a contemporaneous motion for leave to file 10 those documents under seal and shall be filed consistent with the Court’s electronic filing 11 procedures in accordance with Local Rule IA 10-5. Notwithstanding any agreement 12 among the Parties, the party seeking to file a paper under seal bears the burden of 13 14 overcoming the presumption in favor of public access to papers filed in court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pintos v. PACIFIC CREDITORS ASS'N
605 F.3d 665 (Ninth Circuit, 2010)
United States v. Lowell M. Birrell
447 F.2d 1168 (Second Circuit, 1971)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Woolley v. Welch, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/woolley-v-welch-nvd-2025.