Woolley v. Disbrey

2 N.J.L. 383

Opinion

By the Court.

— We do not think that the constable can maintain an action in his own name for this money, without a promise on the part of the defendant below to repay him, or unless he paid it at the request of the defendant below, from which, perhaps a promise might be implied.

Judgment reversed.

Distinguished in Liddel v. McVickar, 6 Halst. 44, 55.