Woolley v. Colson Amusement Co.
206 A.D. 721
Opinion
Judgment and order reversed, with costs. The judgment as rendered was contrary to law within the ruling laid down in the following cases: Demarest v. Flack (128 N. Y. 205); Van Antwerp v. Linton (89 Hun, 417, 419; affd., 157 N. Y. 716); Murray v. Usher (117 id. 542); Burns v. Pethcal (75 Hun, 437, 442); Mauer v. Egan (182 N. Y. Supp. 180); Potter v. Gilbert (130 App. Div. 632; affd., 196 N. Y. 576). The complaint against the defendant Colson is dismissed, with costs. Kelly, P. J., Rich, Jaycox, Manning and Kelby, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Woolley v. Colson Amusement Co., 206 A.D. 721 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1923).
206 A.D. 721 (Woolley v. Colson Amusement Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Van Antwerp v. . Linton
53 N.E. 1133 (New York Court of Appeals, 1899)
Demarest v. . Flack
28 N.E. 645 (New York Court of Appeals, 1891)
Potter v. Gilbert
130 A.D. 632 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1909)
Potter v. Gilbert
196 N.Y. 576 (New York Court of Appeals, 1909)
Burns v. Pethcal
27 N.Y.S. 499 (New York Supreme Court, 1894)
Van Antwerp v. Linton
35 N.Y.S. 318 (New York Supreme Court, 1895)