Woolley v. Colson Amusement Co.
This text of 206 A.D. 721 (Woolley v. Colson Amusement Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment and order reversed, with costs. The judgment as rendered was contrary to law within the ruling laid down in the following cases: Demarest v. Flack (128 N. Y. 205); Van Antwerp v. Linton (89 Hun, 417, 419; affd., 157 N. Y. 716); Murray v. Usher (117 id. 542); Burns v. Pethcal (75 Hun, 437, 442); Mauer v. Egan (182 N. Y. Supp. 180); Potter v. Gilbert (130 App. Div. 632; affd., 196 N. Y. 576). The complaint against the defendant Colson is dismissed, with costs. Kelly, P. J., Rich, Jaycox, Manning and Kelby, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
206 A.D. 721, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/woolley-v-colson-amusement-co-nyappdiv-1923.