Woolley v. Adams

Supreme Court of Georgia

Woolley v. Adams

11 S.E. 784, 85 Ga. 659, 1890 Ga. LEXIS 128

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided July 7, 1890·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Blandford, Justice.

In this case a motion for a new trial was made upon the ground that the verdict was contrary to the evidence [664]*664and contrary to law. "We think, iipon a full consideration of this case, and after having considered ail the evidence submitted by the parties, that there was sufficient evidence to authorize the verdict, and that the same was not contrary thereto or contrary to law; and the judgment is therefore Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Blandford, Justice.

In this case a motion for a new trial was made upon the ground that the verdict was contrary to the evidence [664]*664and contrary to law. "We think, iipon a full consideration of this case, and after having considered ail the evidence submitted by the parties, that there was sufficient evidence to authorize the verdict, and that the same was not contrary thereto or contrary to law; and the judgment is therefore Affirmed.

Woolley v. Adams, 11 S.E. 784, 85 Ga. 659, 1890 Ga. LEXIS 128 (Ga. 1890).

Pincite

11 S.E. 784 (Woolley v. Adams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related