Woolfork v. Chesapeake Mail Clerk
This text of Woolfork v. Chesapeake Mail Clerk (Woolfork v. Chesapeake Mail Clerk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-6840
LARRY WOOLFORK,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CHESAPEAKE MAIL CLERK, Mail Clerk; JOHN NEWHART, Sheriff,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Anthony John Trenga, District Judge. (1:09-cv-00198-AJT-TCB)
Submitted: September 10, 2009 Decided: September 15, 2009
Before KING, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Larry Woolfork, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Larry Woolfork appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) action as frivolous. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Woolfork v. Chesapeake Mail Clerk, No. 1:09-cv-00198-
AJT-TCB (E.D. Va. filed Apr. 15, 2009, entered Apr. 16, 2009).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Woolfork v. Chesapeake Mail Clerk, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/woolfork-v-chesapeake-mail-clerk-ca4-2009.