Woolfork v. Chesapeake Mail Clerk

Fourth Circuit

Woolfork v. Chesapeake Mail Clerk

332 F. App'x 71

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 15, 2009·No. No. 09-6840·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Larry Woolfork appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) action as frivolous. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Woolfork v. Chesapeake Mail Clerk, No. 1:09-cv-00198-AJT-TCB (E.D. Va. filed Apr. 15, 2009, entered Apr. 16, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Larry Woolfork appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) action as frivolous. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Woolfork v. Chesapeake Mail Clerk, No. 1:09-cv-00198-AJT-TCB (E.D. Va. filed Apr. 15, 2009, entered Apr. 16, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Woolfork v. Chesapeake Mail Clerk, 332 F. App'x 71 (4th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

332 F. App'x 71 (Woolfork v. Chesapeake Mail Clerk) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related