Woolfork v. Chesapeake Mail Clerk

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 15, 2009
Docket09-6840
StatusUnpublished

This text of Woolfork v. Chesapeake Mail Clerk (Woolfork v. Chesapeake Mail Clerk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Woolfork v. Chesapeake Mail Clerk, (4th Cir. 2009).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6840

LARRY WOOLFORK,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

CHESAPEAKE MAIL CLERK, Mail Clerk; JOHN NEWHART, Sheriff,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Anthony John Trenga, District Judge. (1:09-cv-00198-AJT-TCB)

Submitted: September 10, 2009 Decided: September 15, 2009

Before KING, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Larry Woolfork, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Larry Woolfork appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) action as frivolous. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Woolfork v. Chesapeake Mail Clerk, No. 1:09-cv-00198-

AJT-TCB (E.D. Va. filed Apr. 15, 2009, entered Apr. 16, 2009).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Woolfork v. Chesapeake Mail Clerk, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/woolfork-v-chesapeake-mail-clerk-ca4-2009.