Woolfolk v. State
250 S.W.3d 441, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 554, 2008 WL 1788189
Opinion
ORDER
Guy Woolfolk appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Woolfolk v. State, 250 S.W.3d 441, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 554, 2008 WL 1788189 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).
250 S.W.3d 441 (Woolfolk v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Midwest Eye Associates, Inc. v. Three Flags Center, L.P.
250 S.W.3d 441 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008)