Woolf v. Reed

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Woolf v. Reed

7 A.D.2d 898, 181 N.Y.S.2d 948, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10090

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 3, 1959

StatusPublished

This text of 7 A.D.2d 898 (Woolf v. Reed) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Woolf v. Reed, 7 A.D.2d 898, 181 N.Y.S.2d 948, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10090 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1959).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal dismissed, without costs. The Special Term order from which this appeal is taken does not affect a substantial right and, therefore, is nonappealable. Defendant could have complied with subdivision 1 of rule XI of the New York County Supreme Court Trial Term Rules by serving a new notice of examination. Costs are disallowed 'because the respondent’s brief was neither served nor filed within the time provided therefor by the rules. Concur—Breitel, J. P., Rabin, M. M. Frank, Valente and McNally, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal dismissed, without costs. The Special Term order from which this appeal is taken does not affect a substantial right and, therefore, is nonappealable. Defendant could have complied with subdivision 1 of rule XI of the New York County Supreme Court Trial Term Rules by serving a new notice of examination. Costs are disallowed 'because the respondent’s brief was neither served nor filed within the time provided therefor by the rules. Concur—Breitel, J. P., Rabin, M. M. Frank, Valente and McNally, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

7 A.D.2d 898, 181 N.Y.S.2d 948, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10090, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/woolf-v-reed-nyappdiv-1959.