Wooldridge v. State
88 S.W.2d 488, 1935 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 627
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Wooldridge v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 133 Tex. Crim. 386 →
Opinion
Conviction is for possessing whisky for the purpose of sale; punishment being two years in the penitentiary.
Pending appeal, the law (Pen.Code 1925, art. 666 et seq., as amended) under which conviction was had has been repealed. See Acts 44th Legislature, 2d C.S., § 49, article 1 of the' Liquor Control Act (Vernon’s Ann.P.C. art. 666—49), and Guy Meadows v. State (Tex.Cr.App.) 88 S.W.(2d) 481, opinion this date.
The judgment is reversed and the prosecution ordered dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Wooldridge v. State, 88 S.W.2d 488, 1935 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 627 (Tex. 1935).
88 S.W.2d 488 (Wooldridge v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Meadows v. State
88 S.W.2d 481 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1935)