Woolbright v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Woolbright v. State

112 So. 927, 22 Ala. App. 699

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 11, 1927

Docket6 Div. 46.

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 112 So. 927 (Woolbright v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Woolbright v. State, 112 So. 927, 22 Ala. App. 699 (Ala. Ct. App. 1927).

Pincite

Opinion

RICE, J.

Appellant was convicted of the offense of violating the prohibition laws. The trial df the cause was had, judgment rendered, motion for new trial overruled, and sentence pronounced on November 10, 1925. The bill of exceptions was not tendered to the presiding judge, nor filed with the clerk, until May 8, 1926, which was not within the time prescribed by law. Accordingly the said bill of exceptions is hereby stricken, in accordance with the motion of the Attorney General. There appearing no error in the record, the judgment is affirmed. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

RICE, J.

Appellant was convicted of the offense of violating the prohibition laws. The trial df the cause was had, judgment rendered, motion for new trial overruled, and sentence pronounced on November 10, 1925. The bill of exceptions was not tendered to the presiding judge, nor filed with the clerk, until May 8, 1926, which was not within the time prescribed by law. Accordingly the said bill of exceptions is hereby stricken, in accordance with the motion of the Attorney General. There appearing no error in the record, the judgment is affirmed. Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

112 So. 927, 22 Ala. App. 699, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/woolbright-v-state-alactapp-1927.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack