Woolard v. State
This text of 992 So. 2d 919 (Woolard v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Robert WOOLARD, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Robert Woolard, Mayo, pro se.
Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Daniel P. Hyndman, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.
Prior report: 894 So.2d 259.
PER CURIAM.
We reverse and remand the dismissal with prejudice of Woolard's amended rule 3.850 motion for postconviction relief. As the dismissal without prejudice of his initial motion did not advise him that the insufficiency concerned his having alleged Paragraphs 32 and 56 "upon information and belief," but pointed out only the insufficiency of his oath at the end of his motion, which he promptly corrected, the trial court should have been given him one more opportunity to amend. As the time for filing a timely rule 3.850 expiredin this case, after the filing of the amended motionthe trial court on remand should give Woolard a brief period of time within which to amend.
POLEN, TAYLOR and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
992 So. 2d 919, 2008 WL 4723544, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/woolard-v-state-fladistctapp-2008.