Woolard, A. v. Ct. Com. Pl. Phila. Cty.
This text of Woolard, A. v. Ct. Com. Pl. Phila. Cty. (Woolard, A. v. Ct. Com. Pl. Phila. Cty.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
ADONIUS WOOLARD, No. 108 EM 2015
Petitioner
v.
COURT OF COMMON PLEAS COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA ET AL., SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT ET AL., ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA ET AL.,
Respondents
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 22nd day of October, 2015, the Application for Leave to File
Original Process is GRANTED. To the extent the Petition for Writ of Mandamus and/or
Extraordinary Relief seeks to compel the common pleas court’s compliance with the
Superior Court’s January 29, 2015, remand order, that petition is GRANTED. The
Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County is DIRECTED to comply with the
Superior Court’s remand order within 30 days.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Woolard, A. v. Ct. Com. Pl. Phila. Cty., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/woolard-a-v-ct-com-pl-phila-cty-pa-2015.