Woody's Lumber Co. v. Jayram Realty Corp.

46 A.D.3d 804, 847 N.Y.S.2d 643
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 18, 2007·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In an action, inter alia, for specific performance of a contract for the sale of real property, the defendant appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Cozzens, J.), dated December 19, 2006, as granted those branches of the plaintiff’s motion which were to vacate a stipulation of discontinuance and a stipulation cancel-ling a lis pendens and to reinstate the action.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The plaintiff established its entitlement to vacatur of a stipulation of discontinuance and a stipulation cancelling a lis pendens. The Supreme Court correctly concluded that the plaintiffs default under an escrow agreement, by delivering the duly executed and notarized note one day late, was inadvertent [805]*805and minor and the result of miscommunication between the parties. Accordingly, the defendant’s attempt to take advantage of a technical default was properly rejected by the Supreme Court (see Weitz v Murphy, 241 AD2d 547, 548-549 [1997]; Bank of N.Y. v Forlini, 220 AD2d 377, 378 [1995]; Goldstein v Goldsmith, 243 App Div 268, 272 [1935]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Crane, J.P., Rivera, Angiolillo and Dickerson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Woody's Lumber Co. v. Jayram Realty Corp., 46 A.D.3d 804, 847 N.Y.S.2d 643 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

46 A.D.3d 804 (Woody's Lumber Co. v. Jayram Realty Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Avery v. Aery
55 A.D.3d 1095 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)