Woody v. Woody

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Woody v. Woody

575 So. 2d 230, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 767, 1991 WL 10393

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 29, 1991

DocketNo. 90-2837

StatusPublished

This text of 575 So. 2d 230 (Woody v. Woody) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Woody v. Woody, 575 So. 2d 230, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 767, 1991 WL 10393 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant has taken a timely appeal from a final order of dissolution of marriage. After filing of the initial brief, however, appellee moved this court for a remand, conceding that the order on appeal did not have sufficient findings of fact to withstand appellate review. See Kim v. Bradshaw, 569 So.2d 532 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990); Raehn v. Raehn, 557 So.2d 152 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990). Appellant has not timely responded to the motion and accordingly we reverse and remand the order here on appeal for entry of an amended final judgment setting forth findings of fact. Either or both parties may, of course, seek appl-late review of the amended final judgment by initiating a new appellate proceeding.

REVERSED.

SHIVERS, C.J., and WENTWORTH and ZEHMER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant has taken a timely appeal from a final order of dissolution of marriage. After filing of the initial brief, however, appellee moved this court for a remand, conceding that the order on appeal did not have sufficient findings of fact to withstand appellate review. See Kim v. Bradshaw, 569 So.2d 532 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990); Raehn v. Raehn, 557 So.2d 152 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990). Appellant has not timely responded to the motion and accordingly we reverse and remand the order here on appeal for entry of an amended final judgment setting forth findings of fact. Either or both parties may, of course, seek appl-late review of the amended final judgment by initiating a new appellate proceeding.

REVERSED.

SHIVERS, C.J., and WENTWORTH and ZEHMER, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

575 So. 2d 230, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 767, 1991 WL 10393, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/woody-v-woody-fladistctapp-1991.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack