Woody v. State of North Carolina
This text of 274 F. App'x 261 (Woody v. State of North Carolina) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Andre Lamar Woody appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint without prejudice under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000) and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. * See Woody v. North Carolina, No. 2:07-cv-00032-D, 2007 WL 3530513 (E.D.N.C Oct. 3 and Nov. 9, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.
We also deny Woody’s request for mandamus relief.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
274 F. App'x 261, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/woody-v-state-of-north-carolina-ca4-2008.