Woody v. Prudential Life Insurance Co. of America

209 N.C. 364
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedJanuary 22, 1936
StatusPublished

This text of 209 N.C. 364 (Woody v. Prudential Life Insurance Co. of America) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Woody v. Prudential Life Insurance Co. of America, 209 N.C. 364 (N.C. 1936).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment of nonsuit must be sustained. The receipt by the defendant of the alleged usury of $209.00 does not sufficiently appear, and, if it did, the statute of limitations is a complete bar. No payments of interest were made after 5 July, 1932.

The other item of $50.00 was an attorney’s fee, paid by the plaintiffs in a settlement made after a sale of the premises had been made in July, 1934, and under the evidence in this case this could not be held to be usurious. C. S., 442; Trust Co. v. Redwine, 204 N. C., 125.

On the record before us the judgment of nonsuit is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Farmers Bank & Trust Co. v. Redwine
167 S.E. 687 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1933)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
209 N.C. 364, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/woody-v-prudential-life-insurance-co-of-america-nc-1936.