Woody v. Florida Parole Commission
This text of 752 So. 2d 1273 (Woody v. Florida Parole Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petitioner, John Woody, has filed a pro se petition for writ of certiorari, challenging the Broward Circuit Court’s April 15, 1999 order granting a motion by respondents, Florida Parole Commission and Florida Department of Corrections, to dismiss his habeas petition.1 In accordance [1274]*1274with this court’s order in his original direct appeal to this court — case no. 99-15302— petitioner now moves for certiorari review.
Because we need only review the trial court’s order dismissing the habeas corpus petition for lack of jurisdiction, we do not reach the merits of the habeas claim. On the jurisdiction point, we find that the trial court erred in dismissing the habeas petition. It should have transferred the case to the appropriate court. See Wigfals v. Florida Parole Comm’n, 691 So.2d 644 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997). We, thus, quash the order of dismissal and remand for transfer of the petition to the Dade Circuit Court, where parties can raise all appropriate claims of mootness and arguments on the merits.
CERTIORARI GRANTED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
752 So. 2d 1273, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 2747, 2000 WL 276014, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/woody-v-florida-parole-commission-fladistctapp-2000.