Woody v. Fleming

60 F.3d 827, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 24723, 1995 WL 404937
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 10, 1995·No. 94-7347·Published

Opinion

60 F.3d 827
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Robert L. WOODY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
R. FLEMING, Warden; Dave Robinson, Assistant Warden;
Kimberly W. Patterson; Major Walker, Nottoway Center;
Sergeant Royall, Nottoway Center; Correctional Officer
Eames; Correctional Officer Foster, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 94-7347.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted June 22, 1995.
Decided July 10, 1995.

Robert L. Woody, Appellant Pro Se.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before HALL, MURNAGHAN, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Woody v. Fleming, No. CA-94-910-2 (E.D. Va. Sept. 20, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Woody v. Fleming, 60 F.3d 827, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 24723, 1995 WL 404937 (4th Cir. 1995).

60 F.3d 827 (Woody v. Fleming) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.