Woody v. Centura Bank Inc
This text of Woody v. Centura Bank Inc (Woody v. Centura Bank Inc) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-1654
TRACY WOODY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
CENTURA BANK, INCORPORATED/RBC CENTURA BANK,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-02-176-5-H)
Submitted: July 8, 2003 Decided: July 23, 2003
Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Tracy Woody, Appellant Pro Se. Timothy Wood Wilson, POYNER & SPRUILL, Rocky Mount, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Tracy Woody appeals the district court’s order dismissing her
civil action for failure to comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 8, 12(b).
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. See Woody v. Centura Bank Inc., No. CA-02-176-5-H (E.D.N.C.
Apr. 23, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Woody v. Centura Bank Inc, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/woody-v-centura-bank-inc-ca4-2003.