Woody v. Centura Bank Inc

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJuly 23, 2003
Docket03-1654
StatusUnpublished

This text of Woody v. Centura Bank Inc (Woody v. Centura Bank Inc) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Woody v. Centura Bank Inc, (4th Cir. 2003).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-1654

TRACY WOODY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

CENTURA BANK, INCORPORATED/RBC CENTURA BANK,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-02-176-5-H)

Submitted: July 8, 2003 Decided: July 23, 2003

Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tracy Woody, Appellant Pro Se. Timothy Wood Wilson, POYNER & SPRUILL, Rocky Mount, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Tracy Woody appeals the district court’s order dismissing her

civil action for failure to comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 8, 12(b).

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. See Woody v. Centura Bank Inc., No. CA-02-176-5-H (E.D.N.C.

Apr. 23, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Woody v. Centura Bank Inc, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/woody-v-centura-bank-inc-ca4-2003.