Woody v. Barnett

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Woody v. Barnett

92 S.E.2d 178, 243 N.C. 782, 1956 N.C. LEXIS 623

CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina

DecidedApril 18, 1956

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 92 S.E.2d 178 (Woody v. Barnett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Woody v. Barnett, 92 S.E.2d 178, 243 N.C. 782, 1956 N.C. LEXIS 623 (N.C. 1956).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Upon a careful review and consideration of the judgment rolls in the previous actions and proceeding pertaining to the abandoned segment of road here involved, in the light of well established applicable principles of law, there is no sufficient evidence to support a plea of res judicata. And the case was properly submitted to the jury on the single issue. The assignments of error presented fail to show error for which the judgment should be disturbed.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Upon a careful review and consideration of the judgment rolls in the previous actions and proceeding pertaining to the abandoned segment of road here involved, in the light of well established applicable principles of law, there is no sufficient evidence to support a plea of res judicata. And the case was properly submitted to the jury on the single issue. The assignments of error presented fail to show error for which the judgment should be disturbed.

No error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

92 S.E.2d 178, 243 N.C. 782, 1956 N.C. LEXIS 623, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/woody-v-barnett-nc-1956.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack