Woody v. Barnett

92 S.E.2d 178, 243 N.C. 782, 1956 N.C. LEXIS 623
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided April 18, 1956·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Upon a careful review and consideration of the judgment rolls in the previous actions and proceeding pertaining to the abandoned segment of road here involved, in the light of well established applicable principles of law, there is no sufficient evidence to support a plea of res judicata. And the case was properly submitted to the jury on the single issue. The assignments of error presented fail to show error for which the judgment should be disturbed.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Woody v. Barnett, 92 S.E.2d 178, 243 N.C. 782, 1956 N.C. LEXIS 623 (N.C. 1956).

92 S.E.2d 178 (Woody v. Barnett) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mellor v. Chamberlin
673 P.2d 610 (Washington Supreme Court, 1983)