Woodworth v. Superior Court

94 P. 232, 153 Cal. 38, 1908 Cal. LEXIS 412
California Supreme Court·Decided February 10, 1908·No. S.F. No. 4955.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

It cannot be held that the state may not, under some circumstances, maintain an action to prevent the issuance of a certificate of purchase of state land, which, as we read the pleadings, is practically the character of the action, the prosecution of which is here sought to be enjoined by prohibition. If this be so, we cannot say that the superior court has no jurisdiction of the action. The objection made by petitioner really is that the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. It may be that the complaint here does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, but that is a matter for the trial court to determine in the exercise of its jurisdiction, and prohibition will not lie.

Application denied. *Page 39

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Woodworth v. Superior Court, 94 P. 232, 153 Cal. 38, 1908 Cal. LEXIS 412 (Cal. 1908).

94 P. 232 (Woodworth v. Superior Court) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tide Water Associated Oil Co. v. Superior Court
279 P.2d 35 (California Supreme Court, 1955)