Woodworth v. Sasseen
226 A.D. 698
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 15, 1929·No. Appeal No. 1·Published
Opinion
Order denying motion to vacate notice of examination before trial affirmed, with -ten dollars costs and disbursements. [699]*699Examination to proceed on five days’ notice. No opinion. Rich, Kapper and Seeger, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., and Young, J., dissent upon the ground that issue has not been joined as to the counterclaim and that the notice of examination was premature.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Woodworth v. Sasseen, 226 A.D. 698 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1929).
226 A.D. 698 (Woodworth v. Sasseen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.