Woodworth v. . Rice Brothers Company
135 N.E. 925, 233 N.Y. 577, 1922 N.Y. LEXIS 992
This text of 135 N.E. 925 (Woodworth v. . Rice Brothers Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Woodworth v. . Rice Brothers Company, 135 N.E. 925, 233 N.Y. 577, 1922 N.Y. LEXIS 992 (N.Y. 1922).
Opinion
Judgment affirmed,, with costs; no opinión.
Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Hogan, Cardozo, Pound,' McLaughlin, Crane and Andrews, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Holdridge v. Heyer-Schulte Corp. of Santa Barbara
440 F. Supp. 1088 (N.D. New York, 1977)
Mittasch v. Seal Lock Burial Vault, Inc.
42 A.D.2d 573 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1973)
Cecala v. Title Guarantee Co.
45 Misc. 2d 986 (New York Supreme Court, 1965)
Citizens Utilities Co. v. American Locomotive Co.
184 N.E.2d 171 (New York Court of Appeals, 1962)
Gile v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
281 A.D. 95 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1952)
United States v. Curtiss Aeroplane Co.
50 F. Supp. 477 (S.D. New York, 1943)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
135 N.E. 925, 233 N.Y. 577, 1922 N.Y. LEXIS 992, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/woodworth-v-rice-brothers-company-ny-1922.