Woodworth v. Fuller

24 Ill. 109
CourtIllinois Supreme Court
DecidedApril 15, 1860
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 24 Ill. 109 (Woodworth v. Fuller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Woodworth v. Fuller, 24 Ill. 109 (Ill. 1860).

Opinion

Catón, C. J.

This action was brought by three persons, as individuals, nothing upon the face of the papers showing that they were partners. Upon the trial, they proved a cause of action in favor of 0. F. Fuller & Co., against the defendants, but failed to show that they constituted the firm of 0. F. Fuller & Co. On this proof they were not entitled to judgment. Had they sued as partners, our statute might have dispensed with such proof. But unless they sue as partners, the statute does not relieve them from producing the proof which was required by the common law to maintain the action.

The judgment must be reversed, and the cause remanded.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ullmann v. Kent
60 Ill. 271 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1871)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
24 Ill. 109, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/woodworth-v-fuller-ill-1860.