Woodworth v. Campbell

5 Paige Ch. 518, 1835 N.Y. LEXIS 231, 1835 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 86
New York Court of Chancery·Decided October 29, 1835·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

The Chancellor

decided, that as the parties had a present interest in the rents as tenants in common and were also the owners of the reversion in common, they had a present portable interest in the premises, which would authorize the court to decree a sale in the present suit; but as the lessees were not tenants in common with any of the owners of the rents, or of the reversion, their interests could not be sold; that the sale must be made subject to the rights of such Ies[519] sees during the term for which the premises were leased; and that the lessees would thereby become the tenants to the purchaser of the rents and reversion.

Decree accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Woodworth v. Campbell, 5 Paige Ch. 518, 1835 N.Y. LEXIS 231, 1835 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 86 (N.Y. 1835).

5 Paige Ch. 518 (Woodworth v. Campbell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Turley v. Turley
235 S.W. 18 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1921)
Peterman v. Kingsley
123 N.W. 137 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1909)
Willard v. Willard
145 U.S. 116 (Supreme Court, 1892)
Gayle v. Johnston
80 Ala. 395 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1885)
Cook v. Webb
19 Minn. 167 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1872)