Woodworth v. Brooklyn City R. Co.
This text of 68 N.Y. St. Rep. 885 (Woodworth v. Brooklyn City R. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Buffalo primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— The sole point raised on this appeal is that the verdict is against the weight of evidence. We have carefully read the record, and are satisfied that the case was properly submitted to the jury. The testimony of Mr. Sanford, read as a whole, is not necessarily in conflict with the testimony of plaintiff. It is conceded by the plaintiff that the horse ran away after the collision, and Mr. Sanford testified that plaintiff told him that the horse did run away, but this is to be taken in connection with his testimony at folios 128 and 129. Mr. Dean substantially corroborated plaintiff as to the cause of the collision. Judgment and order denying a new trial affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
68 N.Y. St. Rep. 885, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/woodworth-v-brooklyn-city-r-co-nysuperctbuf-1895.