Woodward v. Tremere

23 Mass. 354
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedMarch 28, 1828
StatusPublished

This text of 23 Mass. 354 (Woodward v. Tremere) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Woodward v. Tremere, 23 Mass. 354 (Mass. 1828).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The general principle determined in Hall v. Williams et al.1 applies to the case now before us. It is true the plaintiff has averred that the defendants had notice of the pendency of the original suit, but there was no service of process upon them, and no appearance on their behalf.

Replication adjudged bad.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
23 Mass. 354, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/woodward-v-tremere-mass-1828.