Woodward v. Sutton
This text of 30 F. Cas. 560 (Woodward v. Sutton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
As the only evidence of the partnership must be either the declarations or the acts of the plaintiffs themselves. and as each of the plaintiffs has come into court, and averred upon the record (by the allegation in the declaration) that he is [561]*561one of tile partners, trading under the firm of Woodward & Co., no further evidence of that fact can be required.
in the case of Tibbs v. Par-rott [supra], gave a naked opinion, that the allegation in the declaration must be proved, but did not say what would be sufficient prima, facie evidence of the fact.
The defendants took a bill of exceptions.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
30 F. Cas. 560, 1 Cranch 351, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/woodward-v-sutton-circtddc-1806.