Woodward v. Schaefer

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Woodward v. Schaefer

91 N.Y.S. 104

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided December 7, 1904·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon the affidavit of the opposing creditor and the nonproduction of the debtor’s schedules in the bankruptcy proceedings the denial of the motion for the discharge of the judgtment may well be sustained under the decisions of Columbia Bank v. Birkett, 174 N. Y. 112, 66 N. E. 652; Tyrrel v. Hammerstein, 33 Misc. Rep. 506, 67 N. Y. Supp. 717; Sutherland v. Lasher, 41 Misc. Rep. 249, 84 N. Y. Supp. 56, affirmed 87 App. Div. 633, 84 N. Y. Supp. 1148; Bernheim v. Bloch (decided by the present term of this court) 91 N. Y. Supp. 40.

Order affirmed, with costs and disbursements.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Upon the affidavit of the opposing creditor and the nonproduction of the debtor’s schedules in the bankruptcy proceedings the denial of the motion for the discharge of the judgtment may well be sustained under the decisions of Columbia Bank v. Birkett, 174 N. Y. 112, 66 N. E. 652; Tyrrel v. Hammerstein, 33 Misc. Rep. 506, 67 N. Y. Supp. 717; Sutherland v. Lasher, 41 Misc. Rep. 249, 84 N. Y. Supp. 56, affirmed 87 App. Div. 633, 84 N. Y. Supp. 1148; Bernheim v. Bloch (decided by the present term of this court) 91 N. Y. Supp. 40.

Order affirmed, with costs and disbursements.

Woodward v. Schaefer, 91 N.Y.S. 104 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1904).

Pincite

91 N.Y.S. 104 (Woodward v. Schaefer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related