Woodward v. Schaefer
This text of 91 N.Y.S. 104 (Woodward v. Schaefer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Upon the affidavit of the opposing creditor and the nonproduction of the debtor’s schedules in the bankruptcy proceedings the denial of the motion for the discharge of the judgtment may well be sustained under the decisions of Columbia Bank v. Birkett, 174 N. Y. 112, 66 N. E. 652; Tyrrel v. Hammerstein, 33 Misc. Rep. 506, 67 N. Y. Supp. 717; Sutherland v. Lasher, 41 Misc. Rep. 249, 84 N. Y. Supp. 56, affirmed 87 App. Div. 633, 84 N. Y. Supp. 1148; Bernheim v. Bloch (decided by the present term of this court) 91 N. Y. Supp. 40.
Order affirmed, with costs and disbursements.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
91 N.Y.S. 104, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/woodward-v-schaefer-nyappterm-1904.