Woodward v. Moore

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Woodward v. Moore

43 S.C.L. 340

DecidedJanuary 15, 1856

StatusPublished

This text of 43 S.C.L. 340 (Woodward v. Moore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Woodward v. Moore, 43 S.C.L. 340 (S.C. Ct. App. 1856).

Pincite

Opinion

Curia, per

Glover, J.

The court is satisfied with the construction of the clause of the sta'tute copied in the report, and with the order granted.

It is only necessary to add that the question is reserved, whether the action of trespass quare clausum fregit, to which the defendant pleads liberum tenementum, is an action “ brought to establish or try the right of title,” &c., and within the provision of the Act.

Motion dismissed.

O’Neall, Withers and Whither, JJ., concurred. Wardlaw, J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Curia, per

Glover, J.

The court is satisfied with the construction of the clause of the sta'tute copied in the report, and with the order granted.

It is only necessary to add that the question is reserved, whether the action of trespass quare clausum fregit, to which the defendant pleads liberum tenementum, is an action “ brought to establish or try the right of title,” &c., and within the provision of the Act.

Motion dismissed.

O’Neall, Withers and Whither, JJ., concurred. Wardlaw, J., absent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

43 S.C.L. 340, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/woodward-v-moore-scctapp-1856.