Woodward v. Hook

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Woodward v. Hook

1 Ky. Op. 94, 1867 Ky. LEXIS 245

DecidedJanuary 10, 1867

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Ky. Op. 94 (Woodward v. Hook) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Woodward v. Hook, 1 Ky. Op. 94, 1867 Ky. LEXIS 245 (Ky. Ct. App. 1867).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion or the Court by

Judge Peters :

When the personal acts of the defendant are alleged and relied upon as the facts constituting a cause of action against him he cannot set up a want of knowledge or information sufficient to [95]*95form a belief as to their existence as a defense. Nor are the-matters alleged in the answer by way of avoidance and defense to-the action. But appellant states that he had no recollection that appellees had brought any tobacco to Paducah nor that he had taken any tobacco of theirs under his supervision and management-,, and further states that his books and memoranda which he kept in relation to the tobacco and cotton over which he took supervision,, as he calls it, were removed from the State by Gen. Paine, and he could not have access to them, thus putting in issue by a sufficient denial the facts that appellees had any tobacco in Paducah,, upon which he did or could have collected the illegal charges alleged to have been collected by him. These material facts having, been traversed by the answer the demurrer to it was improperly sustained. Wherefore, the judgment is reversed, and the cause-remanded, with directions to overrule the demurrer to the answer;, and for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion or the Court by

Judge Peters :

When the personal acts of the defendant are alleged and relied upon as the facts constituting a cause of action against him he cannot set up a want of knowledge or information sufficient to [95]*95form a belief as to their existence as a defense. Nor are the-matters alleged in the answer by way of avoidance and defense to-the action. But appellant states that he had no recollection that appellees had brought any tobacco to Paducah nor that he had taken any tobacco of theirs under his supervision and management-,, and further states that his books and memoranda which he kept in relation to the tobacco and cotton over which he took supervision,, as he calls it, were removed from the State by Gen. Paine, and he could not have access to them, thus putting in issue by a sufficient denial the facts that appellees had any tobacco in Paducah,, upon which he did or could have collected the illegal charges alleged to have been collected by him. These material facts having, been traversed by the answer the demurrer to it was improperly sustained. Wherefore, the judgment is reversed, and the cause-remanded, with directions to overrule the demurrer to the answer;, and for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Ky. Op. 94, 1867 Ky. LEXIS 245, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/woodward-v-hook-kyctapp-1867.