Woodward v. Gould
27 F. 182, 1886 U.S. App. LEXIS 2059
This text of 27 F. 182 (Woodward v. Gould) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Woodward v. Gould, 27 F. 182, 1886 U.S. App. LEXIS 2059 (circtedmo 1886).
Opinion
As to the first and second points, it suffices that if the alleged contract was in writing, not averred, and contract filed, the statute provides for the result. It must he taken for granted that the contract was oral. The contract is not clearly stated as to the road or enterprise, or what was done or omitted to be done. Motion sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
27 F. 182, 1886 U.S. App. LEXIS 2059, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/woodward-v-gould-circtedmo-1886.